فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حکمرانی فرهنگ

فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حکمرانی فرهنگ

عادی سازی فساد و مولفه های موثر بر آن در ورزش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
علی ناصری 1
زهره حسنی 2
بهرام یوسفی 3
علی اشرف خزایی 2
1 دکترای مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه رازی،کرمانشاه، ایران
2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
3 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
10.22034/jsfc.2023.345507.2412
چکیده
هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی و ارزیابی عوامل (درونی و بیرونی) موثر بر عادی‌سازی فساد در ورزش است، لذا با شناسایی این شاخض‌ها به تحلیل فساد ورزشی پرداخته می‌شود. جامعه تحقیق، 23 نفر از خبرگان بین‌المللی می-باشد که در زمینه فساد سابقه پژوهش و مطالعه داشته‌اند. بر اساس مرور ادبیات و پیشینهء پژوهش 15 شاخص شناسایی و استخراج شد. برای تجزیه تحلیل داده‌ها از روش ترکیبی تئوری تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شامل: ANP بر اساس DEMATEL استفاده شد. نتایج روابط علّی-معلولی این پژوهش نشان داد که شاخص‌های جهان بیرونی ( 8 شاخص) به عنوان عوامل اثرگذار (علت)، شناخته شدند. از این بین، شاخص بهشت گمشده، فراوانی فرصت‌های فساد و هزینه‌ی پایین مشارکت در فساد، به ترتیب اثرگزارترین بودند. برقرارسازی نظام پایش و بررسی‌ها برای شناسایی ساختارهای فسادزا و محدود کردن فرصت‌های فساد، متناسب‌سازی نظام جرم و مجازات، تلاش برای مقابله با بی‌تفاوتی و بی‌حسی اجتماعی، ایجاد سیستم‌های آموزشی کارآمد جهت همراه کردن جامعه با استراتژی تقبیح فساد، ایجاد سازوکارهای تشویقی برای اقدامات افشاگرانه، می‌تواند تحمل فساد را در جامعه تا حدود زیادی پایین بیاورد و سهولتِ مشارکت در فساد را از بین ببرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عادی‌سازی فساد
ورزش
بهشت گمشده
تصمیم گیری چند معیاره

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Normalization of corruption and the factors affecting it in sports

نویسندگان English

ali naseri 1
Zohreh Hasani 2
Bahram Yousefi 3
Ali ashraf Khazaei 2
1 PhD in Sport Management, Razi university
2 Assistant Professor of sports management, Razi university
3 Associate Professor of sports management, Razi university
چکیده English

The purpose of this research is to identify and evaluate the factors (internal and external) affecting the normalization of corruption in sports, therefore, by identifying these indicators, sports corruption is analyzed. The research community consists of 23 international experts who have a history of research and study in the field of corruption. Based on literature review and research background, 15 indicators were identified and extracted. For data analysis, the combined method of fuzzy multi-criteria decision theory including: ANP based on DEMATEL was used. The results of the causal-disability relationships of this research showed that the indicators of the external world (8 indicators) were recognized as the influencing factors (cause). Among these, the lost paradise index, the frequency of corruption opportunities, and the low cost of participating in corruption were the most effective, respectively. Establishing a monitoring and investigation system to identify corrupt structures and limit the opportunities for corruption, adapting the crime and punishment system, trying to deal with indifference and social numbness, creating efficient educational systems to bring the society together. With the strategy of denouncing corruption, creating incentive mechanisms for whistle-blowing actions can greatly reduce the tolerance of corruption in the society and eliminate the ease of participation in corruption.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Normalization of corruption
Sports
Lost paradise
Multi-criteria Decision Mmaking
  1. امینی، محمد. (1395). وضعیت فرهنگی جامعه از منظر متولیان فرهنگ؛ موردمطالعه: مدیران و فعالان فرهنگی استان همدان. راهبرد فرهنگ. 9(35)، 235-266.
  2. منصوری، ‌فردین، ‌مژگان حسینی قمی و حسین مصلحتی. (1397). زمینه‌های اجتماعی رواج فساد اقتصادی و اداری (مطالعه درباره‌ی شهرداری‌های مناطق و بانک‌ها در تهران). مسائل اجتماعی ایران؛ 23(9)، 101-124.
  3. Agerberg, M. (2022). Messaging about Corruption: The Power of Social Norms. Governance, 35(3), 929-950.

 

  1. Aluko, M. A. O. (2002). The Institutionalization of Corruption and Its Impact on Political Culture and Behaviour in Nigeria. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 11(3), 1-10.

 

  1. Andreff, W. (2017). Complexity Triggered by Economic Globalisation—The Issue of On-Line Betting-Related Match Fixing. Systems, 5(1), 2-18.
  2. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.
  3. Becker, K. Hauser, C. & Kronthaler, F. (2013). Fostering management education to deter corruption: what do students know about corruption and its legal consequences? Crime, law and social change, 60(2), 227-240.‏
  4. Barr, A. & Serra, D. (2010). Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11-12), 862–869. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.006.
  5. Barberis, N. (2013). Psychology and the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008. Financial innovation: too much or too little, 15-28.
  6. Bell, P. Ten Have, C. and Lauchs, M. (2016). A Case Study Analysis of a Sophisticated Sports Doping Network: Lance Armstrong and the USPS Team. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 46, 57–68.
  7. Brooks, G. & Lavorgna, A. (2017). Lost Eden: The Corruption of Sport. In Corruption in Sport. 79-90.
  8. Chang, J. J. & Lai, C. C. (2002). Is the Efficiency Wage Efficient? The Social Norm and Organizational Corruption. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(1), 27-47.
  9. Chang, E. C. & Huang, S. H. (2016). Corruption Experience, Corruption Tolerance, and Institutional Trust in East Asian Democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 27-44.‏
  10. Dimant, E. & Schulte, T. (2016). The Nature of Corruption: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. German Law Journal, 17(1), 53-72.
  11. Ehrlich, I. (1996). Crime, Punishment and the Market for Offenses. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 10, 43–67.
  12. Erlingsson, G. Ó. & Kristinsson, G. H. (2019). Exploring Shades of Corruption Tolerance: Tentative Lessons From Iceland and Sweden. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (5), 141-164.‏
  13. Erturan-Ogut, E. E. & Sahin, M. Y. (2014). Political Clientelism in Turkish Sports Federations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(5), 556-566.‏
  14. Forrest, D. (2012). The Threat to Football from Betting-Related Corruption. International Journal of Sport Finance, 7 Issue 2, 99-116.
  15. Forrest, D., and Simmons, R. (2004). Sport and Gambling. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 19, 598–611.
  16. Girginov, V. (2009). Bulgarian Sport Policy 1945–1989: A Strategic Relations Approach. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 26, 515–538.
  17. Girginov, V. & Sandanski I. (2008). Understanding the Changing Nature of Sports Organisations in Transforming Societies. Sport Management Review, 11(1), 21–50.
  18. Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (2002). Rethinking Rationality. In G. Gigerenzer and R. Selten, eds. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, 1–12.
  19. Geeraert, A. (2013). The Governance Agenda and Its Relevance for Sport: Introducing the Four Dimensions of the AGGIS Sports Governance Observer. In J. Alm (ed.), Action for Good Governance in International Sports 9–21.
  20. Geeraert, A. and Drieskens, E. (2015). The EU Controls FIFA and UEFA: a Principal–Agent Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1448–66.
  21. Geeraert, A. (2016). The Governance of International Sport Organisations. In B. Houlihan and D. Malcolm (eds), Sport in society: a student introduction. 37–413.
  22. Gorse, S. and Chadwick, S. (2010). The Prevalence of Corruption in International Sport: a Statistical Analysis. London: Remote Gambling Associatio 6-49.
  23. Gottfredson, D. C. (1990). Developing Effective Organizations. Student discipline strategies: Research and practice, 7-174.
  24. Gouldner, A. 1960. The Norm of Reciprocity: a Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25 (2): 161–178.
  25. Graycar, A. & Prenzler, T. (2013). Understanding and Preventing Corruption. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 5(1), 6-23.‏
  26. Henry, I. P. & Nassis, P. (1999). Political Clientelism and Sports Policy in Greece. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 34(1), 43-58.‏
  27. Holmberg, S. Rothstein, B. & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of Government: What you Get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 135-161.
  28. Hu, K. H. Chen, F. H. Tzeng, G. H. & Lee, J. D. (2015). Improving Corporate Governance Effects on an Enterprise Crisis Based on a New Hybrid DEMATEL with the MADM Model. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 43(6), 1395-1412.
  29. John R. Gillis (Ed). (1994). Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton University Press.
  30. Kihl, L. A. (2018). Corruption in Sport: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Routledge Research in Sport and Corruption. 1-235.
  31. Kitschelt, H. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33 (6–7): 845–879.
  32. Köbis, N. C. Troost, M. Brandt, C. O. & Soraperra, I. (2022). Social Norms of Corruption in the Field: Social Nudges on Posters can Help to Reduce Bribery. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(4), 597-624.
  33. Persson, A. Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2013). “Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail: Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem, Governance, 26 (3): 71–449.
  34. Philippou, C. (2019). Towards a Unified Framework for Anti-bribery in Sport Governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 16(2), 83-99.
  35. Lastra, R. Bell, P. & Bond, C. (2016). Sports Betting-motivated Corruption in Australia: an Under-Studied Phenomenon. International Journal of Social Science Research, 4(1), 61-82.‏
  36. Lee, P. C. (2012). Political Clientelism and Professional Baseball in Taiwan: The Merger Between the two Leagues in 2003. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47(4), 475-491.
  37. Levi, L. & Rothstein, B. (2018). Educating Ethical Leaders and Critical Thinkers. University World News, 12.‏
  38. Mitchell, R. B. Crosset, T. & Barr, C. A. (1999). Encouraging Compliance Without Real Power: Sport Associations Regulating Teams. Journal of Sport Management, 13(3), 216-236.
  39. Monteverde, V. H. (2021). The Cost of Corruption and Undue Private Benefit: two Hidden Faces of the Same mirror. Journal of Financial Crime. 29 (12). 653-664.
  40. Moriconi, M. & De Cima, C. (2020). To Report, Or not to Report? From Code of Silence Suppositions Within Sport to Public Secrecy Realities. Crime, Law and Social Change, 74(1), 55-76
  41. Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence: A Review of the Evidence by a Criminologist for Economists. Rev. Econ. 5(1), 83-105.
  42. Newell S (2013) Brands as Masks: Public Secrecy and the Counterfeit in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(1): 138–154.
  43. Numerato, D. (2009). The Institutionalisation of Regional Public Sport Policy in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1(1), 13–30.
  44. Numerato, Dino. (2016). Corruption and Public Secrecy: An Ethnography of Football Match-fixing. Current Sociology, 64.5: 699-717.
  45. Osifo, Charles. (2018). A Network Perspective and Hidden Corruption. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8 (1), 115-136.
  46. Radcliffe, V. S. (2008). Public Secrecy in Auditing: What Government Auditors can not know. Critical Perspectives on accounting, 19 (1), 99-126.
  47. Rothstein, B. (2011). “Anti-Corruption: the Indirect ‘Big Bang’ Approach, Review of International Political Economy, 18(2), 50–228.
  48. Stathopoulou, A. Quansah, T. K. & Balabanis, G. (2021). The Blinding Effects of Team Identification on Sports Corruption: Cross-cultural Evidence from Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-19.‏
  49. Stephenson & Schütte A. (2016). Specialised Anti-corruption Courts: a Comparative Mapping. Report Published in U4 Issue, December, (7). 6-55.
  50. Stokes, S. C. (2007). Political Clientelism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science.
  51. Sung, H. E. (2012). Women in Government, Public Corruption, and Liberal Democracy: a Panel Analysis. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(3), 195-219.
  52. Tallentire, J. (2001). Strategies of Memory: History, Social Memory, and The Community. Histoire Sociale/Social History.‏ 197-212.
  53. Taussig M (1999) Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labour of the Negative. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  54. Tvedten, I. & Picardo, R. (2018). ‘Goats Eat Where They are Tied up’: Illicit and Habitual Corruption in Mozambique. Review of African Political Economy, 45(158), 541-557.‏