Strategy for Culture

Strategy for Culture

A model for investment in the commercialization of cultural research

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Higher Education Management, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University ,Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to present a conceptual model based on the components influencing investment in order to commercialize academic cultural research.The current research is in terms of practical purpose and in terms of mixed exploratory nature. In a qualitative approach, with a systematic review of studies related to the research problem, 53 factors affecting investment in the field of research were calculated in a purposeful judgmental method.Then was selected with the consensus of 17 academic experts,
In a quantitative approach, in order to evaluate the identified components, the opinions of a sample of 56 managers of venture capital funds, who were randomly selected, were collected through a survey method and using a researcher-made questionnaire, and using the structural equation method. It was analyzed with the help of SPSS and LISREL software, and based on that, a conceptual model was designed and presented.
The findings of the research indicate that the state of commercialization of academic research related to cultural research in Iran is not favorable, and the main reasons for this are the inconsistency of higher education research policies, strategic goals of academic research, and market structures for the consumption of cultural products.
The results of the research showed that 46 components in six dimensions have an effect on the investment in the commercialization of academic cultural research; structural and managerial (11 components), specialized (9 components), research (7 components), scientific culture (6 components), commercial (8 components) and value creation (5 components).
Keywords

Subjects


  1. پرندی، منصور، محمد قهرمانی و مقصود فراست خواه.(1394). موانع تجاری‌سازی نتایج تحقیقات دانشگاهی در رشته‌های علوم پایه دانشگاه‌های تهران. انجمن آموزش عالی ایران، 6(4):84-105.
  2. رامانوجام، مادهاوان.(1399). تجاری‌سازی نوآوری، ترجمه: صالح سپهری فرد، چاپ اول، تهران: دنیای اقتصاد.
  3. زارع، هادی و یدالله جهانگیری.(1396). تجاری‌سازی در دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی: دانشگاه‌ها در بازار، چاپ اول، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.
  4. عالی پور، علیرضا و ابوطالب مطلبی.(1395). تجاری‌سازی پژوهش‌های بین‌رشته‌ای، با تأکید بر بسترسازی توسعه سرمایه اجتماعی در دانشگاه‌ها، مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، دوره 3. شماره 1: 275-296.
  5. علوی شاد، عباس.(1401). شناسایی و ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر بازده مطلوب سرمایه‌گذاری، چشم‌انداز مدیریت بازرگانی، دوره 21. شماره 50: 127-105.
  6. علی محمدیان، لقمان.(1399). تجاری‌سازی ایده و اختراع، چاپ اول، تهران: زانکو.
  7. کاظمی،عباس و محبوبه حاج‌حسینی.(1395). مطالعات فرهنگی دانشگاهی در ایران، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
  8. کلونوسکی، دارک.(1395). فرآیند سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر، مترجمان: سعید زرندی، حسین فلاحی، سیاوش صالحی، محمد حلاجیان، چاپ اول، تهران: مهکامه.
  9. واعظی، حمیده.(1401). مدل مشارکتی دانشجو در نظام مدیریت دانشگاهی، فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی، دوره 28. شماره 1: 35-19.
  10. ونگلیمپیارات، جرانی.(1398). تأمین مالی و تجاری‌سازی فناوری، ترجمه جهانگیر یداللهی فارسی، چاپ اول، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
  11. Anirudh A. & Kai H. (2021). Impact Investing: Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 33(2): 153-181, DOI:1080/08276331.2018.1551457.
  12. Barker, Chris and Jane, Emma A. (2016). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice, 5nd Edition, Singapore: sage publication.
  13. Beyadar, H. Saketi, P. and Badizadeh, A. (2021). Identifying and Prioritizing Barriers to the Commercialization of Academic Research, Journal of Comparative Education, 4(1): 1096-1109.
  14. Boussebaa, M.(2021), From Cultural Differences to Cultural Globalization: Towards a New Research agenda in Cross-Cultural Management Studies, Critical Perspectives on International Business, 17(3): 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-01-2020-0003.
  15. Conway, M.(2020). Contested ideas and possible futures for the university, On the Horizon, 28 (1): 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-10-2019-0070.
  16. Cunningham J.A. Harney B. & Fitzgerald C. (2020). University Research Commercialisation: Contextual Factors. SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Effective Technology Transfer Offices. London: springer publish.
  17. EL Baz, J.Jebli, F.Cherrafi, A.Akenroye, T.and Iddik, S.(2022), The Cultural Dimensions in Supply Chain Management Research: a State-of-the-art Review and Research Agenda, European Business Review, 34(2): 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-04-2020-0092.
  18. Kalmakova, D. Bilan, Y. Zhidebekkyzy, A. & Sagiyeva, R. (2021). Commercialization of Conventional and Sustainability-Oriented Innovations: a Comparative Systematic Literature Review, Problems and Perspectives in Management: 19(1): 340-353.
  19. Laopodis, Nikiforos T. (2020). Understanding Investments: Theories and Strategies, 2nd Edition, London: Taylor & Francis Press.
  20. K, Bergner.S & Rybnicek.R. (2021). The Role of Heads of Departments in the Commercialization of University Research, Journal of Business Economics, 91(3): 353–378.
  21. Malwina, , & Hubert, P.(2021). Organizational Potential of Universities for Commercialization, Procedia Computer Science, 192(1): 4467-4477.
  22. Muizniece, L. (2021).University Autonomy and Commercialization of Publicly Funded Research: the Case of Latvia, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(3), 1494–1516.
  23. Mukherjee, S.and Sarkar, R.J.(2021). Investment on Higher Education: A Source of Knowledge Creation & Income Generation, Bhattacharyya, R. (Ed.) Comparative Advantage in the Knowledge Economy, Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley: 241-249. 
  24. Pandey, S.and Kumar, P.(2022). A Theoretical Framework on Return on Investment (ROI) in Academic Libraries, Library Hi Tech, 39(3): 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-11-2021-0082
  25. Suhaimi, N.S.Abdul Halim, M.A.S.and Hashim, H.A.(2022). Commercialization of Academic Research: Assessing the Perception of Academicians at a Public University in Malaysia, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education: 14(1): 59-76.
  26. Sundbo, J.Rubalcaba, L.&Gallouj, F. (2022). Servitization in the Creative and Cultural Industries, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences,14(1): 65-85.
  27. Yin, E.and Phillips, N.(2020). Understanding Value Creation in Cultural Industries: Strategies for Creating and Managing Meaning, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 23:165-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-04-2020-0053
  28. Zhou, J. and Zhou, Z. (2022), The influences of cultural values on the culturalproduct trade: evidence from China, Japan and Korea, Nankai Business Review International, 13)2: 201-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-07-2020-0035